With this communication I file a complaint against James E. Geringer OSB
95178.
Geringer, an attorney for the Oregon State Bar states in his complaint Oregon
State Bar v. A Special Day Guide, Inc., at unnumbered page, but page number 5,
last paragraph, numbered [c.] (c) "Respondent's offer to transfer the infringing
domain to Complainant for $10,000."
This statement is a false statement to a judicial officer by a member of your
bar.
Furthermore, your bar member used subterfuge and deceit in attempts to gather
evidence for this matter while portraying that settlement negotiations were
ongoing and that such settlement negotiations were inadmissible (while quoting
the FRE and Oregon Evidence Rules) while at the same time knowing that he would
introduce any such statements before the National Arbitration Forum, where those
rules would not be applicable in your bar member's view.
I will review the file on this complaint and all evidence submitted by this bar
member in his defense and if he omits any evidence the Oregon State Bar he
should also be charged with not cooperating with your investigation.
As this bar member is your employee or acting in a quasi employee relationship
it is inappropriate for the Oregon State Bar to investigate this complaint
because of obvious bias and prejudice. Therefore, please inform me of a special
master or someone who is NOT a member of the Oregon State Bar who will
investigate and prosecute this matter.
Sincerely,
Private Practice Attorney, Esq.
Oregon State Bar Disposition
"...the mere fact that you dispute the assertion does not make it false, and you will certainly be given the opportunity to address all assertions contained in the complaint...
...outline the factual basis for your conclusion that the statement...is untrue...that Mr.. Geringer knew the statement was untrue at the time he filed the complaint, and that the statement is material to the underlying dispute.
...this office will consider this matter closed."
Lia Saroyan
Assistant Disciplinary counsel
Oregon State Bar